Assange and Rape by Deception

By Jerry Smith Jan 23 2011
assangewatch.blogspot.com

Assange is fighting extradition to Sweden where he is being investigated for rape by deception, among other sex crimes. He has denied the allegations and suggested they are part of a smear campaign by opponents of WikiLeaks.

Here are some other stories about 'Rape by Deception':

Woman ‘tricked into sex’ by penis cream treatment

A schoolteacher from Haverfordwest claims to have been tricked by a Syrian-born airline pilot into having sex with him by pretending he had to administer ointment on the end of his penis.

Sbano claimes the woman invented the entire story about the "treatment", and denies the charges of rape and obtaining money by deception.

Full Story Here or Here


Arab guilty of rape after consensual sex with Jew

A man has been sentenced to 18 months in prison after telling a woman that he was also Jewish. A Palestinian man has been convicted of rape after having consensual sex with a woman who had believed him to be a fellow Jew.

Full Story Here or Here


Woman 'deceived females into sex'

A 25-year-old woman has appeared in court accused of tricking two women into sexual contact - by pretending to be a man.

Samantha Brooks is alleged to have kept up the pretence with one of her alleged victims for a period lasting six years.

Full Story Here


Does sex through fraud constitute rape?

A Hampden County woman was living with her boyfriend, Duane Suliveres, in the basement of his father's home. Duane's brother, Alvin, also lived in the house. One morning, when Duane was working a graveyard shift, the woman says she awoke at 3 a.m. to a man walking into her room. It was dark, she couldn't make out who the person was, but naturally assumed it was her boyfriend. She then asked, "Duane, why are you home so early?" No response. The man then climbed into bed with her, took off her clothes and had sex with her. Afterward, the man got up to leave and, once he opened the door, she realized it was Alvin, not Duane.

Full Story Here


Three Accuse 'Fantasy Man' Lover of Rape

The phone rings late at night. In a sexy whisper, a man persuades a woman to unlock her door, undress, put on a blindfold and wait for him in bed.

At least three women did so, thinking he was their boyfriend, and had sex with the so-called Fantasy Man--one woman twice a week for two months.

Full Story Here


A Gynecologist, having sex with female patients under the guise of treating their menstrual cramps was convicted of rape.

To read the court case go to People v. Minkowski, 204 Cal.App.2d 832.

The bread and butter of this story is: Minkowski had sex with two 16 year old girls (Miss X and Miss Y), and a 19 year girl (Mrs. Z), under the guise of giving them vaginal exams. He would get the women to bend over the examination table and first put an instrument inside of their vaginas. He would then take out the instrument and insert his penis. Miss X and Miss Y have pretty much the same story.

Here are the details of the 16 year old Miss X.

The defendant, William Minkowski, was a physician with offices in Palo Alto, California. On January 7, 1961, Miss X, who was 16 years old, accompanied by her mother went to the defendant's office for the treatment of menstrual cramps. The two families lived on the same street about three houses apart. The defendant had previously treated Miss X and her parents. The two families also had some social contacts.

Miss X removed her clothing, put on a hospital gown and laid on her back on a table with her feet in stirrups while the defendant examined her. No one else was present. The defendant told her that a series of tests were needed to find out what was wrong and clear up the problem.

She returned about a week later for the tests. She had apparently been told it would be a vaginal-smear test. She went into the examination room, removed her clothing and put on a hospital gown. Again, no one else was present.

He told her to lean over a table with her feet spread apart, giving as a reason that it was an easier position for the test. As she did so, the gown would slip off her shoulders. While she was in this position, the defendant used an instrument for a few seconds, and then something else.

The first object was cold and "the second time it wasn't at all." The second object "didn't pinch like the first one did. It wasn't as uncomfortable." The second object "kept coming in and out" of her vagina "it didn't go in and stay like the first one did."

During the examination the defendant exercised her breasts, telling her it was necessary to help stimulate the glands. He used both hands doing this, while the second object was being inserted during the second part of the test. Right before the second part of the test and at the end, she thought she heard a zipper. She also felt clothing against the back of her legs during the second part of the test. She estimated that the whole test would last about three minutes.

Miss X returned to the defendant's office for similar examinations on six or eight other occasions. The last one took place on February 20, 1961. During all examinations, except the one on January 7th, defendant pulled back on her hips several times. Several times during these examinations he wiped Miss X off and then wiped up the floor. After the tests he would tell her to go home and be sure to wash off because the test might cause an infection or she might be allergic to it in some way. Several times during the second part of the test, she thought she felt "a throbbing, or something" in the vaginal area.

On Sunday evening, February 19, which was the day before the last examination, the defendant came to Miss X's home and talked to her and her mother about commencing a second series of tests. He first asked if she could come that evening and later made an appointment for her to come in the following evening, February 20. Within a week after the last test, he again went to her house, attempting to have her take another test that night. She told him she had a babysitting job until 9:30 or 10 p. m. and did not go, although he indicated to her it would not be too late at that hour. He also talked to her mother about it. This conversation took place after Miss X had complained to her mother about the defendant's conduct on February 21, the day following the last examination. It was after the last examination that Miss X was sure that the defendant was using himself during the second part of the test.

Here are the details of the 19 year old Mrs Z.

Mrs. Z was 19 years of age at the time of the events involving the defendant. She was married in January 1961 but at the time of the trial in June 1961 had separated from her husband and was living with her parents. She testified that she went to the defendant for treatment for menstrual cramps on some six to eight occasions, beginning in November 1960 and ending on February 27, 1961. The tests took place about once every two weeks.

On February 27, 1961, the defendant had her undress and put on a white gown. He then had her take a position standing at the examination table, with her legs apart, facing away from him and more or less bent over. This caused the gown to fall open. He first inserted a metal instrument and then an instrument which was somewhat warmer than the first. He then wiped her off and wiped off the floor. During the examination he had one of his hands on her stomach and the other on one of her breasts. He told her that the purpose of this was to stimulate her in a way to activate certain hormones for the vaginal smear. With his hand on her stomach, the defendant pulled her toward him. She felt his pants against her buttocks and heard a zipper. The examination took less than five minutes. The witness told the defendant she was financially unable to continue with the examination, whereupon he answered that it would not cost her anything as he was interested in seeing how her system changed from the last examination. He told her when she got home to douche immediately. Within a short time after she arrived home, he called to ask if she had followed his directions.

Mrs. Z testified that on all previous visits to the defendant in this series of tests the examinations were "roughly--similar. ..." It was not until the last visit that she suspected anything. On cross- examination she testified that it was on this visit that she could feel the defendant's penis inside of her and "knew that it was him and not an instrument."